After every new arrival of Google
we probably see every blogger is making a post without knowing even a single
functionality of that device obviously they don’t have it, isn’t it? But they
have to make a boost to news, making it a buzz
and all that. But what happens when everyone posts the same material, it
encourages a end user blindly to quickly grab a piece of the action.
Similarly the case is here with Google Chromecast the amount of
material that has been posted on this product, last week is much enough to make it a trend to have a Chromecast which is
a Google’s new dongle in everyone's pocket without knowing what this device is
for?
I have a proof about what I am talking about but wait a minute I have to
tell you some more about this phenomenon lets read one of end user review:
“I
canceled my order once I found out that it actually doesn't stream from your
device. All it does apparently is stream directly from youtube or Netflix. Your
pc or smartphone is essentially a remote to tell the device where the URL link
is.”
Amazing isn’t it? More ever
it also needs power supply that nobody is telling and also everyone is wondering that
where to find the list of TV manufacturers that support Chromecast?
In the same conversation it was
asked
"Can it take power from the HDMI socket on newer TV's? I
thought it could. If so then it's an attractive solution for them. Otherwise, dead."
Someone said Chromecast can be powered by HDMI, USB on the TV and Power adopter
but one of the technical person of their community replied
“Source please.
Power over HDMI is not a possibility since all it can "supply" is a
maximum of 50mA via pin 18. I would be *very* surprised if any video streaming
device can survive with that little current.”
Google Chrome is appearing with ambiguous
documentation and no proper sources of its pros and cons all you have to do is
to buy it because it costs only 35$ and after buying you will get proper experience
that you suffered from hurrah!
The fact is that there is no live TV aside from a separate remote and
cable box with a vastly different interface. That’s just one major downside
that makes mass market adoption unlikely. Basically it is just a
internet connection to your TV that can have many benefits to someone who needs
to surf Youtube, Netflix or a few websites that is supported by Chromecast but it doesn’t makes sense
that it’s a live TV and you have remote in your android phone.
Further
investigation and reading what our colleagues need to say have left us even a
lot of perplexed
This lets us
marvel if a video that you derived from your notebook to tablet would ever
stream on Chromecast, and therefore the same goes for private videos that you
just have on your phone. we'll attempt to get an answer to that however it
sounds unlikely creating the AirPlay,
WiDi or Miracast alternative a better solution, at least for now.
Comments
Post a Comment